[116960] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: FCCs RFC for the Definition of Broadband

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Leo Bicknell)
Thu Aug 27 10:58:26 2009

Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 10:58:00 -0400
From: Leo Bicknell <bicknell@ufp.org>
To: nanog@nanog.org
Mail-Followup-To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <4A969C65.8040506@telcodata.us>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org


--0F1p//8PRICkK4MW
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

In a message written on Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 10:47:01AM -0400, Paul Timmins=
 wrote:
> Seems like a good idea to the technical side of me, but the business=20
> side sees a problem: that the employees like to eat in the 33 year span=
=20
> wherein the company isn't making a dime on its customers.

The last letter of ROI is Investment.  When Ford decides to build
a new car it sinks in billions of dollars over a 5 year period where
it makes nothing.  It then starts selling the new model, and finally
reaches a point where it makes a profit, and uses that to find the
next Investment.

What Telecom companies have done is confused infrastructure and
equipment.  It would be stupid to plan on making a profit on your
GSR over 30 years, after 10 it will be functionally obsolete.  When
it comes to equipment the idea of 1-3 year ROI's makes sense.
However, when it comes to fiber or copper in the ground or on a
pole it has a 20, 30, 40, or even 50 year life span.  To require
those assets to have a 1-3 year ROI is absurd.

I remember when Cable TV was "new".  I lived in a neighborhood
without it, and the men with ditch wiches came through and wired
the entire neighborhood.  I don't think it had an ROI of a year,
or even 5, but it has now, 30 years later, spawned a multi-billion
dollar industry and allowed us to have things like Cable Internet,
which weren't even invented at the time.  Someone loaned them the money
to do it, and it appears to me the investment performed well, overall.

--=20
       Leo Bicknell - bicknell@ufp.org - CCIE 3440
        PGP keys at http://www.ufp.org/~bicknell/

--0F1p//8PRICkK4MW
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (FreeBSD)
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=3vMa
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--0F1p//8PRICkK4MW--


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post