[116870] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: Alternatives to storm-control on Cat 6509.

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Roland Dobbins)
Mon Aug 24 14:14:43 2009

From: Roland Dobbins <rdobbins@arbor.net>
To: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
In-Reply-To: <485ED9BA02629E4BBBA53AC892EDA50E097F98B2@usmsxt104.mwd.h2o>
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 01:16:22 +0700
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org


On Aug 25, 2009, at 1:03 AM, Holmes,David A wrote:

> In my opinion the Sup32 platform has some limitations when the  
> technology is considered for high data rate, deterministic carrier  
> customer-facing scenarios


The hardware-based FPM is interesting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Roland Dobbins <rdobbins@arbor.net> // <http://www.arbornetworks.com>

Sorry, sometimes I mistake your existential crises for technical
insights.

			-- xkcd #625



home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post