[116868] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: Data Center testing

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jack Bates)
Mon Aug 24 13:47:35 2009

Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 12:45:41 -0500
From: Jack Bates <jbates@brightok.net>
To: Dan Snyder <sliplever@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <1c2d53bb0908240638t446b0d18tfc711960b84350fc@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org

Dan Snyder wrote:
> We have done power tests before and had no problem.  I guess I am looking
> for someone who does testing of the network equipment outside of just power
> tests.  We had an outage due to a configuration mistake that became apparent
> when a switch failed.  It didn't cause a problem however when we did a power
> test for the whole data center.
> 

The plus side of failure testing is that it can be controlled. The 
downside to failure testing is that you can induce a failure. 
Maintenance windows are cool, but some people really dislike failures of 
any type which limits how often you can test. I personally try for once 
a year. However, a lot can go wrong in a year.

Jack


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post