[116841] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Alternatives to storm-control on Cat 6509.
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Nick Hilliard)
Fri Aug 21 12:05:44 2009
X-Envelope-To: <nanog@nanog.org>
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 17:05:27 +0100
From: Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org>
To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <1115299F-B8BA-4300-AD98-32915343F7C0@arbor.net>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On 21/08/2009 17:04, Roland Dobbins wrote:
> Yes, but this is evil and dangerous in a customer-facing environment;
> transparent mode is the preferred option, in most circumstances.
It is very evil, yes. SXH and later support VTPv3 which allows you to
disable VTP on a per port basis. But as you say, not suitable for customer
facing networks.
Nick
