[116827] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: OSPF vs IS-IS vs PrivateAS eBGP
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Randy Bush)
Thu Aug 20 19:53:13 2009
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 08:52:18 +0900
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
To: Daniel Roesen <dr@cluenet.de>
In-Reply-To: <20090820232613.GA8710@srv03.cluenet.de>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
> Am I alone in my view that BGP is _far_ more simple and
> straight-forward than OSPF
this is a very telling statement in a number of ways.
that ospf has become exceedingly complex, and all that results thereof.
that both are known for their complexity.
randy
