[116815] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: OSPF vs IS-IS vs PrivateAS eBGP
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Joe Provo)
Thu Aug 20 08:21:33 2009
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 08:21:10 -0400
From: Joe Provo <nanog-post@rsuc.gweep.net>
To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <580af3b90908191058n2a0f867en6691c2381c8ec0f3@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-To: nanog-post@rsuc.gweep.net
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 12:58:01PM -0500, Clue Store wrote:
[snip]
> would like to go with , but I have had some in the industry say this is not
> as good as running an IGP with the customer.
Name and shame. TTBOMK, no-one who thought walking that road was a
Good Idea did so for long after starting down the path. As far as
'customer choice' goes, the customer is indeed always right when it
comes to their *desired goal* in the abstract (multihoming, etc),
but rarely if ever in its implementation.
Cheers,
Joe
--
RSUC / GweepNet / Spunk / FnB / Usenix / SAGE
