[116798] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: OSPF vs IS-IS vs PrivateAS eBGP
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Nick Hilliard)
Wed Aug 19 13:02:07 2009
X-Envelope-To: <nanog@nanog.org>
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 18:01:02 +0100
From: Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org>
To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <580af3b90908190812q72a55910w910b9e07327a9e2@mail.gmail.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On 19/08/2009 16:12, Clue Store wrote:
> I would like to run an IGP (currently OSPF) to our customers that are
> multi-homed in a non-mpls environment.
Unless you want your customers to have very substantial control over your
internal network, don't use an SPF IGP like ospf or is-is. You really
want to use BGP for this and private ASNs are fine - that's what they are
there for.
Nick
