[116654] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Follow up to previous post regarding SAAVIS
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Joe Provo)
Wed Aug 12 16:39:02 2009
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 16:37:53 -0400
From: Joe Provo <nanog-post@rsuc.gweep.net>
To: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0908121120001.17443@sasami.anime.net>
Reply-To: nanog-post@rsuc.gweep.net
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 11:20:28AM -0700, goemon@anime.net wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Aug 2009, Christopher Morrow wrote:
> >On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 9:57 AM, Drew Weaver<drew.weaver@thenap.com> wrote:
> >>Anyone know why SAAVIS would be allowing PEER1 (AS 13768) to advertise
> >>routes for whatever IP addresses they want?
> >sadly savvis didn't learn the pccw lesson, which is also the
> >turk-telecom lesson which is also the as7007 lesson which is... fairly
> >sad really in 2009.
> >for the sake of $diety put a prefix-filter on your customer bgp
> >sessions, it ain't hard!
>
> sounds too much like "work" to me. not interested.
The irony is that MCI had (and C&W maintained for quite some time)
a functional, highly automated IRR-based customer filtering system
[props to the Cary team]. Somewhere along the M&A highway, the
work to maintain it was substituted with the work to dismantle it.
Sad to see crap emitted with 3561 in the path.
--
RSUC / GweepNet / Spunk / FnB / Usenix / SAGE
