[11658] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: UUNET - PSI - ?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Randy Bush)
Thu Aug 7 13:13:20 1997
Date: Thu, 7 Aug 97 10:01 PDT
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
To: jamie@intuition.iagnet.net
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
>> Something wrong with this?
>>
>> sho ip bgp 137.39.0.0 255.255.0.0
>> BGP routing table entry for 137.39.0.0/16, version 533944
>> Paths: (2 available, best #2, advertised over IBGP)
>> 174
>> 192.41.177.245 from 192.41.177.245
>> Origin IGP, metric 30, localpref 100, valid, external
>> Community: 2548:668
>> 701
>> 198.32.186.248 from 198.32.186.248 (137.39.3.57)
>> Origin IGP, metric 2, localpref 100, valid, external, best
>> Community: 2548:668
>>
>> *174*?
>
> What's really criminal is that neither of them have NOCs.
From private mail I received, it is clear that I was being too subtle.
UUNET and PSI have perfectly fine NOCs. The problem was that Jamie seems
not to know how to use them and posts to nanog in stead.
Folk, it is no longer safe to assume that clueful folk from provider X read
this list. They have been driven off by the noise. Some weeks back, folk
on a private list asked for anyone who still read nanog to copy over any
useful message. None have been copied. This one certainly won't be. :-)
randy
PS: This is an actual bug. I do not think PSI has bought UUNET.
