[116465] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Sprint/Verizon BGP
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Christopher Morrow)
Wed Aug 5 11:48:27 2009
In-Reply-To: <056c01ca15e2$fa7abb60$ef703220$@edu>
Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 11:48:09 -0400
From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@gmail.com>
To: "Robert D. Scott" <robert@ufl.edu>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org, ebroo@setuidzero.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 11:39 AM, Robert D. Scott<robert@ufl.edu> wrote:
> They will almost always prefer their IBGP to any learned routes. =A0Why s=
end
> traffic to a transit network and skew their I/O peering numbers when you =
can
> handle it yourself. I doubt you will change their mind.
http://onesc.net/communities/as1239/
uhm, prepend and/or localpref fiddling...
-chris
> Robert D. Scott =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 Robert@ufl.edu
> Senior Network Engineer =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 352-273-0113 Phone
> CNS - Network Services =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0352-392-2061 CNS Phone Tree
> University of Florida =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 352-392-9440 FAX
> Florida Lambda Rail =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 352-294-3571 FLR NOC
> Gainesville, FL =A032611 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0321-663-0421 Cell
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Edward Brookhouse [mailto:ebroo@setuidzero.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 05, 2009 11:36 AM
> To: nanog@nanog.org
> Subject: Sprint/Verizon BGP
>
> Hi all,
>
>
>
> Any Sprint BGP admins on this list can offer any thoughts on why Sprint
> connected networks are preferring my Sprint connection when they should b=
e
> preferring my Verizon?
>
>
>
> I (Healthy Directions) am AS16387, two blocks 63.73.158.0/24 and
> 63.78.31.0/24, being announced by sprint and Verizon, preferred to
> Verizon(DS3) over Sprint 3MB.
>
>
>
> Verizon BGP admins think everything is ok, have not heard back from BGP4 =
at
> sprint.
>
>
>
> Any thoughts appreciated, off-list contact welcome.
>
>
>
> Edward
>
> ebroo@healthydirections.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
