[116271] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: OT: Voice Operators' Group forming

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (jamie)
Tue Jul 28 17:51:50 2009

In-Reply-To: <4A6F6FB1.3000607@thewybles.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2009 16:49:52 -0500
From: jamie <j@arpa.com>
To: Charles Wyble <charles@thewybles.com>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org

puck.nether.net.

way to volunteer someone else's box :-)

-j

On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 4:37 PM, Charles Wyble <charles@thewybles.com>wrote:

>
>
> Hiers, David wrote:
>
>> Hi NANOG,
>> I'd like to announce the formation of a NANOG-knockoff group for voice
>> operators, the Voice Operators' Group.
>>
>
> Very cool! :)
>
>
>> Voice network operators share many of the same challenges as IP network
>> operators; we register with registrars (CILLI, OCN, and ACNA as well as ASN
>> and DNS), route traffic (point codes as well as IP addresses), resolve names
>> (CNAM as well as DNS), manage reachability (to countries, LATAs and NPA/NXXs
>> as well as  to IP networks), and deal with equipment issues.
>>
>
> Indeed we do!
>
>>
>> NANOG has been so useful at the IP layer that it seems like a good idea to
>> try to duplicate it a little further up the stack.
>>
>
>
> Yep.
>
>
>> For now, the group is on Yahoo:
>>
>> http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/voip_operators_group/
>>
>> Of course, we're looking for a better place, name, and charter.
>>
>>
> Might I recommend google groups, or puck.nether.org. An IPTV list was
> recently formed.
>
> NAVOG  works for me.
>
>
>
>

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post