[116269] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: OT: Voice Operators' Group forming
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (AMuse)
Tue Jul 28 17:42:48 2009
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2009 14:42:38 -0700
From: AMuse <nanog-amuse@foofus.com>
To: Charles Wyble <charles@thewybles.com>
In-Reply-To: <4A6F6FB1.3000607@thewybles.com>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
I second the idea of google groups or some other group provider; Yahoo
groups are known within many circles for having long email delays.
Charles Wyble wrote:
>
>
> Hiers, David wrote:
>> Hi NANOG,
>> I'd like to announce the formation of a NANOG-knockoff group for
>> voice operators, the Voice Operators' Group.
>
> Very cool! :)
>
>>
>> Voice network operators share many of the same challenges as IP
>> network operators; we register with registrars (CILLI, OCN, and ACNA
>> as well as ASN and DNS), route traffic (point codes as well as IP
>> addresses), resolve names (CNAM as well as DNS), manage reachability
>> (to countries, LATAs and NPA/NXXs as well as to IP networks), and
>> deal with equipment issues.
>
> Indeed we do!
>>
>> NANOG has been so useful at the IP layer that it seems like a good
>> idea to try to duplicate it a little further up the stack.
>
>
> Yep.
>
>>
>> For now, the group is on Yahoo:
>>
>> http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/voip_operators_group/
>>
>> Of course, we're looking for a better place, name, and charter.
>>
>
> Might I recommend google groups, or puck.nether.org. An IPTV list was
> recently formed.
>
> NAVOG works for me.
>
>
