[116251] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Anomalies with AS13214 ?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Stephane Bortzmeyer)
Tue Jul 28 08:33:01 2009
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2009 14:33:45 +0200
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
To: Russell Heilling <chewtoy@s8n.net>
In-Reply-To: <647fc4230907280350m47603268y392b460240d0d473@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 11:50:02AM +0100,
Russell Heilling <chewtoy@s8n.net> wrote
a message of 75 lines which said:
> I guess ROBTEX didn't implement ingress filters after the last
> episode...
It *seems* (I do not know them in detail) that Robtex
<http://www.robtex.com/>, AS 48285, is dedicated to measurements, not
to IP transit. If so, it makes sense for them to accept everything.
If I'm right, it means Cyclops was wrong to have a monitor in an AS
which is not a "real" operator.
