[116197] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: AT&T. Layer 6-8 needed.
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (David Temkin)
Sun Jul 26 23:04:48 2009
In-Reply-To: <6ff30abd0907261947y10263ccam33f51b70b0396a6e@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2009 20:03:57 -0700
From: David Temkin <davet1@gmail.com>
To: jamie <j@arpa.com>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Perfectly reachable from AT&T in NY:
ny01-rtr#traceroute img.4chan.com
Type escape sequence to abort.
Tracing the route to img.4chan.com (208.73.210.27)
1 12.94.163.57 8 msec 4 msec 4 msec
2 cr1.n54ny.ip.att.net (12.122.131.238) [MPLS: Label 16370 Exp 0] 8 msec 8
msec 8 msec
3 ggr4.n54ny.ip.att.net (12.122.131.25) 8 msec 8 msec 4 msec
4 192.205.34.50 16 msec 4 msec 4 msec
5 0.xe-5-0-3.XL4.NYC4.ALTER.NET (152.63.18.10) 36 msec 4 msec 8 msec
6 0.so-6-0-0.XL2.LAX1.ALTER.NET (152.63.57.81) 76 msec 76 msec 76 msec
7 POS7-0.GW4.LAX1.ALTER.NET (152.63.53.61) 76 msec 76 msec 76 msec
8 oversee-gw.customer.alter.net (65.223.29.34) 76 msec 80 msec 80 msec
9 208.73.208.10 80 msec 80 msec 76 msec
10 img.4chan.com (208.73.210.27) 76 msec 76 msec 76 msec
Are you sure this isn't just a technical/routing issue versus a blocking
issue? Seems like everyone's out to make a sensationalist story out of this
when it's unlikely that anyone's awake at AT&T on a Sunday afternoon who
could/would make such a change.
-Dave
On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 7:47 PM, jamie <j@arpa.com> wrote:
> img.4chan.org is the biggest site - I've already received six replies on
> top
> of the list-replies confirming (b/c they saw this problem mentioned on
> sites/blogs) filtering.
>
> technical information, traces, bgp views (esp. from singly-homed T
> customers), etc, encouraged
>
> -jamie
>
>
> >>
> > I don't see a below below.
> >
>
