[116180] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Recommendations for Hong Kong datacenter,
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (George Sanders)
Fri Jul 24 17:05:57 2009
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2009 14:04:59 -0700 (PDT)
From: George Sanders <gosand1982@yahoo.com>
To: Benjamin Billon <bbillon-ml@splio.fr>, nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <4A6A1DA0.7030402@splio.fr>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A________________________________=0AFrom: Benjamin Billon <bb=
illon-ml@splio.fr>=0ATo: nanog@nanog.org=0ASent: Friday, July 24, 2009 3:46=
:24 PM=0ASubject: Re: Recommendations for Hong Kong datacenter, and a sanit=
y check for my geopolitical conclusions ?=0A=0AThe process is good, I did t=
he same excepted I also potentially needed =0Agood Mainland China connectiv=
ity (what are the obvious reasons?), =0Aotherway I think would have take th=
e Singapore option. Getting things =0Adone there is not a problem either.=
=0A=0AI choose the Mega iAdvantage datacenters in HK.=0A=0A=0A=0A=0AYes, th=
ank you - that was the datacenter I had read about in my own research. Wha=
t did you think of the height of that building and its location on reclaime=
d sea land ? It makes me nervous, but as I said in a different message in =
this thread, it looks like ALL of urban HK is reclaimed so ... who knows.=
=0A=0AI was saying that I did not want the servers _inside of_ China, for o=
bvious reasons. Although the actual geography of shenzhen makes it much mo=
re appealing, even though we want greater freedom RE: content/filtering/fre=
edom of speech/etc. (if only for principles sake).=0A=0AThanks for your com=
ments.=0A=0A=0A
