[11616] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: .COM on the move...
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Stephen Sprunk)
Tue Aug 5 10:08:57 1997
Date: Tue, 05 Aug 1997 09:02:00 -0500
To: Jim Fleming <JimFleming@unety.net>
From: Stephen Sprunk <sprunk@csi.net>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <01BCA177.972CB140@webster.unety.net>
NSI, _as stated in their published five-year plan_, appears to be on its
way towards RFC 2050 complaince by continuing the separation of gTLDs and
the root zone. Since J is the first letter for root-only servers, J is
apparently also being used as the first letter for gTLD-only servers (bad
choice IMHO).
Where is the confusion? Wait, nevermind... This is NOT an operational
problem Jim, get your DNS politics OFF nanog.
Stephen
At 08:14 08-05-97 -0500, you wrote:
>
>Just in case people have not noticed...
>
>----------
>From: Richard J. Sexton[SMTP:richard@sexton.org]
>Sent: Monday, August 04, 1997 6:30 PM
>To: edns-discuss@MCS.Net; gtld-discuss@gtld-mou.org; newdom@ar.com;
edns-discuss@MCS.Net; DOMAIN-POLICY@LISTS.INTERNIC.NET
>Subject: Part of the open process?
>
>I'm curious about this:
>
>;; AUTHORITY RECORDS:
>COM. 518400 NS H.ROOT-SERVERS.NET.
>COM. 518400 NS B.ROOT-SERVERS.NET.
>COM. 518400 NS C.ROOT-SERVERS.NET.
>COM. 518400 NS D.ROOT-SERVERS.NET.
>COM. 518400 NS E.ROOT-SERVERS.NET.
>COM. 518400 NS I.ROOT-SERVERS.NET.
>COM. 518400 NS F.ROOT-SERVERS.NET.
>COM. 518400 NS G.ROOT-SERVERS.NET.
>COM. 518400 NS J.GTLD-SERVERS.INTERNIC.NET.
><------------------------
>COM. 518400 NS A.ROOT-SERVERS.NET.
>
--
Unsolicited commercial/propaganda email subject to legal action. Under US
Code Title 47, Sec.227(a)(2)(B), Sec.227(b)(1)(C), and Sec.227(b)(3)(C), a
State may impose a fine of not less than $500 per message. Read the full
text of Title 47 Sec 227 at http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/47/227.html
