|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2009 18:17:31 +0300 From: Gadi Evron <ge@linuxbox.org> To: Graeme Fowler <graeme@graemef.net> In-Reply-To: <1248267950.28824.18.camel@squonk.lboro.ac.uk> Cc: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org> Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org Graeme Fowler wrote: > http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/8163190.stm > > Some of it is right. Some of it is wrong. All of it makes for > interesting reading from the point of view of a layperson. > > We are all, apparently, unsung heroes... > > Graeme > > PS Yes, there's plenty to tear apart in the article. Don't shoot the > messenger though! And it wasn't really NANOG that did or does much of what he describes, but NANOG is a "good enough" representative name for the community of people who do, when we our definition to network operations. Gadi. > > -- Gadi Evron, ge@linuxbox.org. Blog: http://gevron.livejournal.com/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |