[116116] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: Cisco 7600 (7609) as a core BGP router.
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Drew Weaver)
Tue Jul 21 17:03:13 2009
From: Drew Weaver <drew.weaver@thenap.com>
To: 'Roland Dobbins' <rdobbins@arbor.net>, NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2009 17:02:55 -0400
In-Reply-To: <CC581BAA-67A8-48D9-A534-CE22BD8A2000@arbor.net>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Jul 20, 2009, at 5:26 PM, Neil J. McRae wrote:
> GSR is far better platform.
Concur 100%.
---
I'm probably wrong, but aren't the 7600s 40Gbps per slot vs the GSR only be=
ing 10Gbps per slot? and doesn't that mean that there should (fairly soon) =
be a new version of the GSR coming that ups the slot width?
-Drew
