[116094] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Cisco 7600 (7609) as a core BGP router.
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Alex H. Ryu)
Mon Jul 20 10:51:07 2009
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2009 09:50:45 -0500
From: "Alex H. Ryu" <r.hyunseog@ieee.org>
To: Paul Stewart <pstewart@nexicomgroup.net>
In-Reply-To: <C0A98BB6DAFAAB46A78BBA2C51B98F3E3FB371@nexus.nexicomgroup.net>
Cc: "Neil J. McRae" <neil@DOMINO.ORG>, nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Because of nowadays network scalability demands, Cisco is preparing ASR
14000 series to replace this one, I think. ^^
Basically ASR 14000 is downgrade version of CRS-1, but I consider it is
still developing or beta product.
Alex
Paul Stewart wrote:
> Agreed... we migrated away from GSR to 7600 and now looking at migrating
> back...;) GSR was 100% rock solid for us with PRP-2 processors....
> sup720-3bxl has been good but no comparison...
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Neil J. McRae [mailto:neil@DOMINO.ORG]
> Sent: Monday, July 20, 2009 6:26 AM
> To: nanog@nanog.org
> Subject: RE: Cisco 7600 (7609) as a core BGP router.
>
> Personally I'd avoid this platform given 6+ years of trying to make it
> work
> reliably. GSR is far better platform.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> "The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and contains confidential and/or privileged material. If you received this in error, please contact the sender immediately and then destroy this transmission, including all attachments, without copying, distributing or disclosing same. Thank you."
>
>
>
> .
>
>
