[116043] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Cisco 7600 (7609) as a core BGP router.
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Steven King)
Fri Jul 17 17:31:12 2009
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2009 17:30:50 -0400
From: Steven King <sking@kingrst.com>
To: Jim Wininger <jwininger@indianafiber.net>
In-Reply-To: <C686640A.1213B%jwininger@indianafiber.net>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
We use the 7600 platform as a Customer Border device. It attaches
directly to our core, and directly to our customers. This has been a
solid platform. Before this we used to use the 7600 as a load balancer
for a DNS cluster. Worked fairly well. We use the 6500 series for our
main network infrastructure and to border/core/dist layers and they are
rock solid, as long as you stay away from the SXH images. These are a
bit buggy and we have had routers crash due to that image. We have
deployed a few new devices with the SXI and are very happy with them
currently.
Jim Wininger wrote:
> I have an opportuniy to put two 7609s into the core of my network.
>
> Currently we have 3 upstream providers, taking full BGP routes. (2 in one
> router and one in another). We have 17 BGP peers/customers (peering to each
> router), and adding about one new BGP peer every 2-3 months. It is a modest
> network by most standards. We are running OSPF and BGP between the existing
> routers.
>
> Not rocket science, nothing special (no MPLS, no VRF etc), very simple
> network.
>
> Does anyone have any recommendations on the 7600's as a core BGP router?
> Good or bad? Have they been a stable platform in a core/BGP environment?
>
--
Steve King
Network Engineer - Liquid Web, Inc.
Cisco Certified Network Associate
CompTIA Linux+ Certified Professional
CompTIA A+ Certified Professional
