[115935] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: BGP Growth projections
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Mark Radabaugh)
Sun Jul 12 21:30:13 2009
Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2009 21:28:54 -0400
From: Mark Radabaugh <mark@amplex.net>
To: Ivan Pepelnjak <ip@ioshints.info>
In-Reply-To: <00fb01ca01f9$00b8dc80$0a00000a@nil.si>
Cc: 'nanog list' <nanog@merit.edu>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Ivan Pepelnjak wrote:
> Let me be the devil's advocate: why would you need full Internet routing?
> Taking reasonably sized neighborhoods of your upstreams (AS paths up to X AS
> numbers) plus a default to your best upstream might do the trick.
>
> Ivan
>
>
We currently do exactly that - dropping anything longer than a /23 with
default routes to cover anything missing. Since were replacing the
routers anyway I would prefer to have the capacity to do things
correctly rather than what, at least to me, seems a kludge. It is a
very workable solution - just not one I am completely comfortable with.
--
Mark Radabaugh
Amplex
419.837.5015 x21
mark@amplex.net
