|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 13:18:58 -0500 From: "Alex H. Ryu" <r.hyunseog@ieee.org> To: Antonio Querubin <tony@lava.net> In-Reply-To: <alpine.OSX.1.00.0907100755030.399@cust11794.lava.net> Cc: nanog@merit.edu Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org If it is the way AT&T have designed their product, there may be no other way around. >From AT&T's viewpoint, it will add more complexity to troubleshoot. If you pay extra, AT&T may have some solution for you. Alex Antonio Querubin wrote: > On Fri, 10 Jul 2009, Jay Nakamura wrote: > >> We are getting an Ethernet DIA circuit from AT&T but they insist that >> they can't BGP peer with 2 routers on our side. The WAN circuit can >> only have /30 they say. Has anyone been able to successfully talk >> them in to bending their rule? If so, how? > > Sounds odd. They do IPv6 tunnels using 2 tunnels/routers. The /30 > reason is even more odd for an ethernet circuit. > > Antonio Querubin > whois: AQ7-ARIN > > >
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |