[115519] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Use of Default in the DFZ: banned in philly,
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Randy Bush)
Thu Jun 25 05:13:11 2009
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 18:12:56 +0900
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
To: Jack Bates <jbates@brightok.net>
In-Reply-To: <4A4289F9.8080405@brightok.net>
Cc: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
> That's where the confusion sets in, and Randy even stated that the UCLA
> data is suspect; partially because it considers a stub to be 4 or less
> downstream ASNs. I think Randy's data would be better reflected without
> the UCLA information which just confuses it.
the first pie chart uses no classification. if we had to classify, we
would have stubs only end as paths (_foo$) and transits are all the
rest.
i do not know how we would separate small and large transits in any
rigorous fashion. so it was easier to use the ucla taxa as a rough
approximation and blame anything weird on them :)
we could do a quick run using the definition of stub and transit as
above if folk are really interested.
randy
