[115517] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: tor
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Suresh Ramasubramanian)
Thu Jun 25 00:35:46 2009
In-Reply-To: <20090625042928.GL1012@skywalker.creative.net.au>
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 10:04:11 +0530
From: Suresh Ramasubramanian <ops.lists@gmail.com>
To: Adrian Chadd <adrian@creative.net.au>
Cc: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 9:59 AM, Adrian Chadd<adrian@creative.net.au> wrote:
> Fine; re-phrase my question as "an organisation currently enjoying common carrier
> status."
You do realize that even where the telco division of carrier X is a
common carrier but the ISP division is typically not ..
And even were the telco to run a tor node, their charter as a common
carrier probably doesnt specify that theyre a common carrier for tor
nodes.
so ...
--
Suresh Ramasubramanian (ops.lists@gmail.com)
