[115513] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: tor

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Suresh Ramasubramanian)
Wed Jun 24 23:53:30 2009

In-Reply-To: <1E8B940C5E21014AB8BE70B975D40EDB016282F4@bert.HiberniaAtlantic.local>
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 09:22:53 +0530
From: Suresh Ramasubramanian <ops.lists@gmail.com>
To: Rod Beck <Rod.Beck@hiberniaatlantic.com>
Cc: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org

Rod - you wouldnt qualify as an ISP - or even a "provider of an
interactive computer service" to go by the language in 47 USC 230, by
simply running a TOR exit node.

On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 4:15 AM, Rod Beck<Rod.Beck@hiberniaatlantic.com> wrote:
> Richard,
>
> The question is how much ISPs should be responsible for the actions of their clients.
>
> My point is that is not obvious where you draw the line.
>
> I have yet to see anyone, including yourself, articulate a general principle (maybe it doesn't exist).
>


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post