[115385] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

RE: Wireless bridge

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Bret Clark)
Thu Jun 18 13:58:08 2009

From: Bret Clark <bclark@spectraaccess.com>
To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <DB9EA494D2E5614D842C2BC65C2D17227C4146@mail-ww.vanoppen.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 13:56:52 -0400
Reply-To: bclark@spectraaccess.com
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org

On Thu, 2009-06-18 at 09:34 -0700, John van Oppen wrote:

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tim Huffman [mailto:Tim@bobbroadband.com] 
> Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2009 9:27 AM
> To: nanog@nanog.org
> Subject: RE: Wireless bridge
> 
> > The line of sight is all clear, no trees. Only one building along
> the
> way
> > has a rooftop of similar height, but the antennas are extended far
> above
> > the
> > roofline. We have used a rifle scope to confirm line of sight is all
> clear
> > at all angles.
> > 
> 
> Unfortunately, you can't necessarily rely on visual line of sight. At
> 800meters, the Fresnel Zone on your radio is about 14ft in diameter at
> the midpoint. You need to make sure that this is free of obstructions.
> 


Not only that, the radios may actually be screaming at each other at
those distances which will affect performance

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post