[115376] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Wireless bridge
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Curtis Maurand)
Thu Jun 18 13:15:19 2009
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 13:13:17 -0400
From: Curtis Maurand <cmaurand@xyonet.com>
To: Lyndon Nerenberg <lyndon@orthanc.ca>
In-Reply-To: <1245341463.1310.22.camel@legolas.orthanc.ca>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org, Peter Boone <NANOG@Aquillar.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Lyndon Nerenberg wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-06-18 at 11:54 -0400, Peter Boone wrote:
>
>> Oh I know. Luckily it's located in an industrial area just on the
>> outskirts
>> of the city. There isn't a lot of other WiFi (in my opinion); 3-5
>> total
>> SSIDs spread across 2 of the 3 physical channels (1,6,11) depending on
>> which
>> rooftop you measure from.
>>
>
> 2.4 and 5GHz license-free Wifi is license free because the frequencies
> are shared with the ISM (Industrial/Scientific/Medical) services. In an
> industrial area, competing WiFi is the least of your worries. These
> frequencies are also used by industrial grade heating units. Got anyone
> in the neighbourhood running a large plastic shrink wrap machine, for
> example?
>
>
Motion sensors also run in the 2.4GHz range.
> You can't directly detect these other users with a Wifi transceiver.
> Depending on the nature of the interference you *might* be able to hear
> it directly on a scanner (if you can find one that covers those
> frequencies), but you really need a good spectrum analyzer to tell
> what's going on.
>
> Anyway, don't assume the competition for spectrum is only other Wifi
> units.
>
> --lyndon
>
>
>
