[115253] in North American Network Operators' Group
IPv6 transits (Was: Cogent input)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jeroen Massar)
Sun Jun 14 18:05:03 2009
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 00:04:46 +0200
From: Jeroen Massar <jeroen@unfix.org>
To: NANOG <nanog@merit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <20090614215246.GA8015@ajax.opentransit.net>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156)
--------------enig1768E6C9FEF1D1BB4ECC1C80
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
German Martinez wrote:
> On Thu Jun 11, 2009, John van Oppen wrote:
>=20
>> NTT (2914) and GBLX (3549) both do native v6... most everyone else on=
>> the tier1 list does tunnels. :(
>=20
> AS5511 runs a double stack network for at least 7 years.
>=20
>> There are some nice tier2 networks who do native v6, tiscali and he.ne=
t
>> come to mind.
For people trying to find the "list", check:
http://www.sixxs.net/faq/connectivity/?faq=3Dipv6transit
Of course, for updates etc, don't hesitate to mail...
Greets,
Jeroen
--------------enig1768E6C9FEF1D1BB4ECC1C80
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32)
iD8DBQFKNXP+KaooUjM+fCMRAsGGAKCZY8G/my6LdJlU/awVx/qk+S2xFQCgntzw
fWGVg+Pqooa5A2T90paBqPI=
=0DWY
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--------------enig1768E6C9FEF1D1BB4ECC1C80--
