[115201] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Cogent input
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (sthaug@nethelp.no)
Fri Jun 12 02:13:53 2009
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 08:12:42 +0200 (CEST)
To: tore@linpro.no
From: sthaug@nethelp.no
In-Reply-To: <4A31E68C.4080305@linpro.no>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
> It's worth noting that being a v4 "tier1"/transit-free network doesn't
> necessarily mean that they're the same in the v6 world. For instance,
> Google appears to be a transit-free v6 network. It wouldn't surprise me
> if the same is true for other big v6 players like Tinet and HE.
Good point.
> Anyway, when looking for v6 transit the following page might be useful:
>
> http://www.sixxs.net/faq/connectivity/?faq=ipv6transit
Yup, but take it with a grain of salt. Level3, for instance, definitely
doesn't offer native IPv6 with the same geographical distribution as
IPv4.
Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sthaug@nethelp.no
