[115196] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: Cogent input
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (John van Oppen)
Thu Jun 11 19:32:00 2009
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 16:31:24 -0700
From: "John van Oppen" <john@vanoppen.com>
To: "Paul Timmins" <paul@telcodata.us>, "Justin Shore" <justin@justinshore.com>
Cc: NANOG <nanog@merit.edu>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
NTT (2914) and GBLX (3549) both do native v6... most everyone else on
the tier1 list does tunnels. :(
There are some nice tier2 networks who do native v6, tiscali and he.net
come to mind.
-John
-----Original Message-----
From: Paul Timmins [mailto:paul@telcodata.us]=20
Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 4:00 PM
To: Justin Shore
Cc: NANOG
Subject: Re: Cogent input
>
> I hope at least some SPs make this commitment back in the states. I=20
> can't find any tier-1s that can provide us with native v6. Our tier-1
> upstream has a best effort test program in place that uses ipv6ip=20
> tunnels. The other upstream says that they aren't making any public=20
> IPv6 plans yet. It's hard to push the migration to v6 along when=20
> native v6 providers aren't readily available.
GlobalCrossing told me today I can order native IPv6 anywhere on their=20
network. Don't know if they count as Tier 1 on your list, though. VZB=20
has given me tunnels for a while, hopefully they'll get their pMTU issue
fixed so we can do more interesting things with it.
-Paul
