[115178] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Cogent input
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Stephen Kratzer)
Thu Jun 11 11:05:36 2009
From: Stephen Kratzer <kratzers@pa.net>
To: nanog@nanog.org,
bclark@spectraaccess.com
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 11:03:21 -0400
In-Reply-To: <1244731753.26816.34.camel@acer-laptop>
Cc: NANOG <nanog@merit.edu>
Reply-To: kratzers@pa.net
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Perhaps you missed my quote:
"Cogent's official stance on IPv6 is that we will deploy IPv6 when it
becomes a commercial necessity. We have tested IPv6 and we have our plan
for rolling it out, but there are no commercial drivers to spend money
to upgrade a network to IPv6 for no real return on investment."
This came rom a contact at Cogent (not sure of the role, probably sales rep).
On Thursday 11 June 2009 10:49:13 Bret Clark wrote:
> I'm skeptical as to where this info came from since this seems nothing
> more then nay-say? if people are going to make grandiose statements then
> they should justify them with reputable evidence. I would be extremely
> surprised if Cogent engineering isn't working on a IPv6 plan or doesn't
> have one already in place.
>
> Bret
>
> On Thu, 2009-06-11 at 10:37 -0400, Steve Bertrand wrote:
> > Stephen Kratzer wrote:
> > > And, they have no plans to support IPv6.
> >
> > Ouch!
> >
> > I hope this is a non-starter for a lot of folks.
> >
> > Steve
