[115037] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Facility wide DR/Continuity
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (gb10hkzo-nanog@yahoo.co.uk)
Wed Jun 3 12:15:16 2009
Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 09:15:06 -0700 (PDT)
From: gb10hkzo-nanog@yahoo.co.uk
To: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Some things just don't active/active nicely on a budget.=0A=0A> Sure, beca=
use of inefficient legacy design choices.=0A=0A=0ARoland, =0A=0AI'm not sur=
e I understand your argument here.=0A=0ABudget is very much an issue when c=
hoosing between active/active and active/passive. Nothing to do with "inef=
ficient legacy design".=0A=0AFor example, consider the licensing and hardwa=
re costs involved in running something like Oracle Database in active/activ=
e mode (in a topology that is supported by Oracle Tech Support).=0A=0A=0A=
=0A
