[115027] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Facility wide DR/Continuity
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (William Herrin)
Wed Jun 3 11:06:57 2009
In-Reply-To: <116413.94510.qm@web24701.mail.ird.yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 11:05:15 -0400
From: William Herrin <herrin-nanog@dirtside.com>
To: gb10hkzo-nanog@yahoo.co.uk
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 10:53 AM, <gb10hkzo-nanog@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> - whether you are after an active/active or active/passive solution
In practice, active/passive DR solutions often fail. You rarely need
to fail over to the passive system. When you finally do need to fail
over, there are a dozen configuration changes that didn't make it from
the active system, so the passive system isn't in a runable state.
Regards,
Bill Herrin
--
William D. Herrin ................ herrin@dirtside.com bill@herrin.us
3005 Crane Dr. ...................... Web: <http://bill.herrin.us/>
Falls Church, VA 22042-3004