[114978] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: White House net security paper

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Paul Vixie)
Tue Jun 2 05:42:21 2009

To: nanog@merit.edu
From: Paul Vixie <vixie@isc.org>
Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2009 09:42:12 +0000
In-Reply-To: <m2ws7wtn7l.wl%randy@psg.com> (Randy Bush's message of "Mon\,
	01 Jun 2009 16\:41\:50 +0900")
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org

Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> writes:

>> ...  a few battalions of B's and C's, if wisely deployed, could bridge
>> that gap.
>
> there is a reason Bs and Cs have spare round-tuits.
>
> fred brooks was no fool.  os/360 taught some of us some lessons.
> batallions work in the infantry, or so i am told.  this is rocket
> science.

to me "wisely" means backfilling 80% of what the Good Guys do that isn't
rocket science.  (most A's are not doing only what only A's can do.)
-- 
Paul Vixie
KI6YSY


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post