[114908] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: White House net security paper
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Andrew Euell)
Fri May 29 13:33:47 2009
In-Reply-To: <20090529164122.GB9629@vacation.karoshi.com.>
Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 13:33:31 -0400
From: Andrew Euell <andyzweb@gmail.com>
To: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
"The Nation=92s approach to cybersecurity over the past 15 years has failed=
to
keep pace with the threat."
I think that they may be getting it...
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 12:41 PM, <bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com> wrote:
> fine piece of work.
>
>
>
> On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 11:37:58AM -0500, jamie rishaw wrote:
> > The White House just put out a release on net security[1] - at first
> glance
> > a mission/vision/values paper, the release page[2] also containing a
> short
> > video[3].
> >
> > At first glance, this looks promising - anyone else get a chance to
> > read/review? Comments?
> >
> >
> > -jamie
> >
> >
> >
> > [1] http://www.whitehouse.gov/asset.aspx?AssetId=3D1732
> > [2] http://www.whitehouse.gov/CyberReview/ (other links here as well)
> > [3]
> http://www.whitehouse.gov/videos/2009/May/20090529_Cyber_Security.mp4
> >
> > --
> > Jamie Rishaw // .com.arpa@j <- reverse it. ish.
> > [Impressive C-level Title Here], arpa / arpa labs
>
>
--=20
Andrew Euell
andyzweb [at] gmail [dot] com
