[114887] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: glue record
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Warren Bailey)
Fri May 29 02:23:19 2009
Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 22:19:03 -0800
In-Reply-To: <f1dedf9c0905282312u4799a670sc024d8fa9e1f59eb@mail.gmail.com>
From: "Warren Bailey" <wbailey@gci.com>
To: "Scott Howard" <scott@doc.net.au>,
"Anton Zimm" <anton.zimm@gmail.com>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Beat me to it.. Bleh.
Though I will admit, this reminds me of a very painful experience when I
got my first dedicated server back in 1999. Death me to BIND. Glad I'm
not a DNS admin :)
//warren
-----Original Message-----
From: Scott Howard [mailto:scott@doc.net.au]=20
Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2009 10:12 PM
To: Anton Zimm
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: glue record
Did you check the "ADDITIONAL SECTION" in what you've pasted below?
Scott.
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 11:06 PM, Anton Zimm <anton.zimm@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm looking for glue record for ns1.push.mobi so I ask one of the root
> name server.
> It gives me the list of dot mobi authorized name servers.
>
> I'm expecting it to be answered by one of the mobi tld authorized name
> servers, but it's telling me that it delegates the answer to=20
> ns1.push.mobi instead. It does not make sense for me because how can I
> ask ns1.push.mobi if I don't know its ip address yet...
> Clue please..?
>
> -----
> az@hollywood:~$ dig @B2.MOBI.AFILIAS-NST.ORG. ns1.push.mobi ....
>
> ;; QUESTION SECTION:
> ;ns1.push.mobi. IN A
>
> ;; AUTHORITY SECTION:
> push.mobi. 86400 IN NS ns1.push.mobi.
> push.mobi. 86400 IN NS ns2.push.mobi.
>
> ;; ADDITIONAL SECTION:
> ns1.push.mobi. 86400 IN A 117.102.248.2
> ns2.push.mobi. 86400 IN A 117.102.248.3
> -----
>
> best,
> Anton.
>
>
