[114854] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: navog?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jared Mauch)
Thu May 28 10:26:12 2009
From: Jared Mauch <jared@puck.nether.net>
To: "J. Oquendo" <sil@infiltrated.net>
In-Reply-To: <4A1E9CA3.6020302@infiltrated.net>
Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 10:24:13 -0400
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On May 28, 2009, at 10:16 AM, J. Oquendo wrote:
> david hiers wrote:
>> Hi,
>> Is anyone aware of a voip-focused group similar to nanog? Us voip
>> pukes
>> have to deal with the issues of allocation, routing, and management
>> of phone
>> numbers as well as networks, and I have not found a voice
>> operators' group
>> similar to this network operators' group.
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> David
>>
> On the other hand, I don't know that I'd want to see a multitude of
> messages
> from someone saying "My trixbox dialplan doesn't work!" or, (broken
> english
> purposely inserted) "Why my Cisco Call Manager is tell me to
> partition!
Actually, there is a quite active cisco-voip list over on puck that
discusses exactly the CM issues you refer to. (I diverted everyone to
that list to keep it off c-nsp and it seems to have grown since).
- Jared
http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
