[114759] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: AH or ESP
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Tony Hain)
Tue May 26 16:01:47 2009
From: "Tony Hain" <alh-ietf@tndh.net>
To: "'Merike Kaeo'" <kaeo@merike.com>,
"'Jack Kohn'" <kohn.jack@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <7AF939ED-28E6-4814-A774-F75FED105888@merike.com>
Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 13:00:51 -0700
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Reply-To: alh-ietf@tndh.net
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Merike Kaeo wrote:
...
> ESP-Null came about when folks
> realized AH could not traverse NATs.
Thus the absolute reason why people should promote AH to kill off the 66nat
nonsense. Just because you can't use it for IPv4 is no reason to avoid using
it for IPv6 now and let its momentum suppress the 66CGN walled garden
mindset.
Tony
