[114735] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Multi-homed clients and BGP timers
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Florian Weimer)
Mon May 25 13:33:50 2009
From: Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>
To: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>
Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 19:33:26 +0200
In-Reply-To: <31E19C60-CD1E-4023-ACC0-0748E1ECE5D5@muada.com> (Iljitsch van
Beijnum's message of "Sat, 23 May 2009 14:54:49 +0200")
Cc: nanog list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
* Iljitsch van Beijnum:
> 30 60 isn't a good choice because that means that after 30.1 seconds a
> keepalive comes in and then after 60.0 seconds the session will expire
> while the second one would be there in 60.1 seconds.
Wouldn't the underlying TCP retry sooner than that?
