[11448] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: how to protect name servers against cache corruption

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jay R. Ashworth)
Wed Jul 30 09:44:20 1997

Date: Wed, 30 Jul 1997 09:09:36 -0400
From: "Jay R. Ashworth" <jra@scfn.thpl.lib.fl.us>
To: tqbf@enteract.com
Cc: perry@piermont.com, nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <199707300233.VAA03343@enteract.com>; from "Thomas H. Ptacek" <tqbf@enteract.com> on Tue, Jul 29, 1997 at 09:33:25PM -0500

On Tue, Jul 29, 1997 at 09:33:25PM -0500, Thomas H. Ptacek wrote:
> > No, it *is* immune to all variants on *THAT* attack. It isn't immune
> > to other sorts of attacks.
> 
> I think you are speaking in fairly blatant factual error here, or we are
> in micommunication with respect to the meaning of the word "variant".

And to think that _I_ was getting yelled at last week.

Furrfu!

I'm having no trouble at all understanding Messrs. Vixie and Metzger.
Why, Thomas, do _you_ seem to be unable to get it?  Do you have,
perhaps, (say it softly) a hidden agenda?

Cheers,
-- jra
-- 
Jay R. Ashworth                                                jra@baylink.com
Member of the Technical Staff             Unsolicited Commercial Emailers Sued
The Suncoast Freenet      "People propose, science studies, technology
Tampa Bay, Florida          conforms."  -- Dr. Don Norman      +1 813 790 7592

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post