[114454] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: two interfaces one subnet
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Arnold Nipper)
Mon May 11 18:24:08 2009
Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 00:13:19 +0200
From: Arnold Nipper <arnold@nipper.de>
To: "Patrick W. Gilmore" <patrick@ianai.net>
In-Reply-To: <D4CE8369-D27B-448E-AC5A-A87273273996@ianai.net>
Cc: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156)
--------------enig67D4E322CE7F7EB818C38D3B
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On 11.05.2009 23:47 Patrick W. Gilmore wrote
> On May 11, 2009, at 5:19 PM, Alex H. Ryu wrote:
>=20
>> It may be allowed from host-level, but from router equipment, I don't
>> think it was allowed at all.
>=20
> Ever used HSRP / VRRP? Two interfaces in the same subnet. Works =20
> fine. In fact, most people think it works _better_ than one interface =
=20
> in the same subnet.
>=20
I guess you are mixing interfaces with IPs now. Don't you?
Arnold
--=20
Arnold Nipper / nIPper consulting, Sandhausen, Germany
email: arnold@nipper.de phone: +49 6224 9259 299
mobile: +49 172 2650958 fax: +49 6224 9259 333
--------------enig67D4E322CE7F7EB818C38D3B
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFKCKL/rz6CwpRB/EwRAi2MAJ9vrDZPyR7WSe/vePFr1dcOJ2zfXwCglcv1
dIuSquVh43LmxN2RqwTVMQE=
=ueUq
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--------------enig67D4E322CE7F7EB818C38D3B--
