|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
From: Chris Meidinger <cmeidinger@sendmail.com> To: "Alex H. Ryu" <r.hyunseog@ieee.org> In-Reply-To: <4A08967C.7010901@ieee.org> Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 23:23:11 +0200 Cc: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org> Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org On 11.05.2009, at 23:19, Alex H. Ryu wrote: > Unless you configure Layer 2 for two interfaces, it's not going to > work. > It is invalid from networking principle. > If you have to send the traffic for host in same subnet you > configured, > which interface it should send out ? > Basically it may create broadcast storm loop by putting two ip > addresses > in same subnet in different interface. > It may be allowed from host-level, but from router equipment, I don't > think it was allowed at all. Alex, I _personally_ know that it's a problem. I was hoping for an RFC- reference, or similar standards document, to show to customers to convince them to stop trying to hack things to make it work. Chris
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |