[114356] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: UCEProtect Level 3
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (D'Arcy J.M. Cain)
Thu May 7 16:29:23 2009
Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 16:29:19 -0400
From: "D'Arcy J.M. Cain" <darcy@druid.net>
To: Rich Kulawiec <rsk@gsp.org>
In-Reply-To: <20090507202126.GA26174@gsp.org>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Thu, 7 May 2009 16:21:26 -0400
Rich Kulawiec <rsk@gsp.org> wrote:
> (a) This discussion should probably be happening someplace other
> than NANOG (spam-l or mailop, perhaps?), and
True. I didn't bring it up but this is my last post on the subject.
> (b) If you feel that UCEProtect L3 paints with too broad a brush,
> then you're certainly free not to use it. I happen to agree with you
> on this particular level of this particular DNSBL for my particular
> applications, so I don't use it either. However: I'm aware of other
> folks who are using it quite effectively as *part* of a scoring system.
I don't use it but my problem was that other ISPs whose clients were
trying to email my clients were using it.
--
D'Arcy J.M. Cain <darcy@druid.net> | Democracy is three wolves
http://www.druid.net/darcy/ | and a sheep voting on
+1 416 425 1212 (DoD#0082) (eNTP) | what's for dinner.
