[114313] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Where to buy Internet IP addresses
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Karl Auer)
Wed May 6 02:44:30 2009
From: Karl Auer <kauer@biplane.com.au>
To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.1.10.0905060743150.22851@uplift.swm.pp.se>
Date: Wed, 06 May 2009 16:44:03 +1000
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
--=-inUIIfJ6IPZFBjxX6mnA
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Wed, 2009-05-06 at 07:49 +0200, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
> > Sorry, I don't see why /56 is qualitatively different to a /60.
> Because more is more, and it makes it less likely that people will start=20
> to invent silly solutions to problems that do not really exist. With a=20
> /56, I can't really imagine this being not enough for 99.9% of households=
=20
> in 10 years, whereas I CAN imagine a household that needs more than 16=20
> subnetworks, plus the PD model described in an earlier email makes a /56=20
> more suited for chaining.
OK, I'm convinced :-)
Thanks, K.
--=20
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Karl Auer (kauer@biplane.com.au) +61-2-64957160 (h)
http://www.biplane.com.au/~kauer/ +61-428-957160 (mob)
GPG fingerprint: 07F3 1DF9 9D45 8BCD 7DD5 00CE 4A44 6A03 F43A 7DEF
--=-inUIIfJ6IPZFBjxX6mnA
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQBKATGzSkRqA/Q6fe8RArxhAJ9lIDkJwCvmBdcq9OC5qPgJBohxCwCg4YTd
OZIiMIeSRZGxd2H86vrlKgQ=
=u1gL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-inUIIfJ6IPZFBjxX6mnA--
