[11429] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: how to protect name servers against cache corruption
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Thomas H. Ptacek)
Tue Jul 29 22:53:49 1997
From: "Thomas H. Ptacek" <tqbf@enteract.com>
To: perry@piermont.com
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 1997 21:33:25 -0500 (CDT)
Cc: tqbf@enteract.com, nanog@merit.edu
Reply-To: tqbf@enteract.com
In-Reply-To: <199707300230.WAA06186@jekyll.piermont.com> from "Perry E. Metzger" at Jul 29, 97 10:30:50 pm
> No, it *is* immune to all variants on *THAT* attack. It isn't immune
> to other sorts of attacks.
I think you are speaking in fairly blatant factual error here, or we are
in micommunication with respect to the meaning of the word "variant".
----------------
Thomas Ptacek at EnterAct, L.L.C., Chicago, IL [tqbf@enteract.com]
----------------
"If you're so special, why aren't you dead?"
