[114238] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: Where to buy Internet IP addresses
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (TJ)
Mon May 4 21:29:51 2009
From: "TJ" <trejrco@gmail.com>
To: "'nanog list'" <nanog@nanog.org>
In-Reply-To: <op.utfhwzdktfhldh@rbeam.xactional.com>
Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 21:29:44 -0400
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Ricky Beam [mailto:jfbeam@gmail.com]
>Sent: Monday, May 04, 2009 7:23 PM
>To: Leo Bicknell; nanog list
>Subject: Re: Where to buy Internet IP addresses
>
>On Mon, 04 May 2009 18:50:04 -0400, Leo Bicknell <bicknell@ufp.org> wrote:
>> My 12.0(S), 12.4, and IOS-XR boxes are operating quite well with
>> /112's and /127's on GigE interfaces to each other, on GSR's, 7300's,
>> and 7200's. We also use /128's on loopbacks.
>
>Must have been old (very old?) code when I first tried this. 12.4(15)T
doesn't
>seem to care.
>
>But it still doesn't allow transitional addresses:
>gw(config-if)#ipv6 address 0::101:101/96
>%FastEthernet0/0: Error: ::1.1.1.1/96 is invalid
>
>gw(config-if)#ipv6 address 0::101:101/128
>%FastEthernet0/0: Error: ::1.1.1.1/128 is invalid
FWIW - ::/96 based addresses ave been deprecated for quite a few years.
/TJ
