|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 15:44:16 -0700 From: "Carlos Alcantar" <carlos@race.com> To: <nanog@nanog.org> Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org Digital cross connect is the way to go if you have the budget to do that. Turin now force 10 make a good dacs and or the cisco 15454 with a ds3-12xm card can do it as well. -carlos -----Original Message----- From: Chatfield, Terry [mailto:Terry.Chatfield@neustar.biz]=20 Sent: Monday, May 04, 2009 2:37 PM To: nanog@nanog.org Subject: RE: DSX cross-connect solution Alternatively, one could use a digital cross-connect. Terry -----Original Message----- From: Ricky Beam [mailto:jfbeam@gmail.com]=20 Sent: Monday, May 04, 2009 5:23 PM To: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: DSX cross-connect solution On Mon, 04 May 2009 16:05:30 -0400, Wallace Keith =20 <kwallace@pcconnection.com> wrote: > I would stick with wire wrap, 66 blocks make an inferior connection. True, but a 66 block will work. Usually. And is easily re-punched. > If someone cannot deal with wire wrapping, they are not living in a > telecom world. Really. Seriously, who cannot do wire wrap? It takes, literally, 5 =20 minutes to learn to do it. And that's with a "screw driver" wirewrap =20 tool. With one of these =20 [http://www.datacomtools.com/catalog/Wire-Wrap-tools/jonard-wire-wrap-gu n.htm], =20 it takes about 10s, and you get a consistent, near perfect wrap every =20 time. (yes, it's a bit pricey, but very worth the cost even if you only use it once to wire a single panel.) --Ricky PS: That's just the gun; it'll need a tip/sleeve. I recommend a complete =20 kit. =20 [http://www.datacomtools.com/catalog/Wire-Wrap-tools/wire-wrap-kits.htm]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |