[114196] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Minnesota to block online gambling sites?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Tim Peiffer)
Mon May 4 12:09:23 2009
Date: Mon, 04 May 2009 11:03:54 -0500
From: Tim Peiffer <peiffer@umn.edu>
To: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
In-Reply-To: <web-24378155@remus.csulb.edu>
Reply-To: peiffer@umn.edu
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Not withstanding the legality of such an order, how would one
operationally enforce that order? Does this order force carriers into
transparent proxy so that L7 filtering can be done? Is the carrier also
required to go through geolocator matching any given IP address with
'Minnesota' so that the filtering can be selectively applied?
Tim Peiffer
Network Support Engineer
OIT / Networking and Telecommunications Services
University of Minnesota / NorthernLights GigaPOP
>>
>> On Sat, May 2, 2009 at 9:34 AM, Ken Gilmour <ken.gilmour@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>> For anyone who cares, IMEGA released the letter from the state of
>>> Minnesota:
>>>
>>> http://www.imega.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/ab001dd4.pdf
>>>
>>> 2009/4/29 Ken Gilmour <ken.gilmour@gmail.com>:
>>>> Hi there,
>>>>
>>>> I am just wondering if anyone knows any more about the attempt by
>>>> Minnesota to block online gambling companies other than what's
>>>> publicly available (e.g.
>>>> http://www.gambling911.com/gambling-news/minnesota-regulators-try-block-access-gambing-sites-042909.html)?
>>>>
>>>> Such as a list or the letter to the providers?
>>>>
>>>> Thank you!
>>>>
>>>> Ken
--
Tim Peiffer
Network Support Engineer
Office of Information Technology
University of Minnesota/NorthernLights GigaPOP
