[114058] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: Study of IPv6 Deployment

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Nathan Ward)
Tue Apr 28 19:26:16 2009

From: Nathan Ward <nanog@daork.net>
To: nanog list <nanog@nanog.org>
In-Reply-To: <49F73D3E.1020700@thelan.no>
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 11:25:58 +1200
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org


On 29/04/2009, at 5:30 AM, Harald Firing Karlsen wrote:

> Please check out the following link with some information/statistics  
> from a LAN-party taking place in Norway (yeah, Norway is in Europe,  
> not North America, but it stills give an overview):
> http://technet.gathering.org/?p=121
>
> There were over 5000 computers in the arena and of those 47% had a  
> valid and working IPv6 address. They was also provided with IPv4 and  
> no NAT at all. The only ports being closed outbound was 25, 135-139  
> and 445. Google over IPv6 was enabled for the event as well, so a  
> lot of the traffic was towards google.


Did you have any problems that you encountered? Poorly behaving IPv6  
stacks, rogue RA+SLAAC/DHCPv6, etc.?

Do you have any netflow logs from the event?

--
Nathan Ward



home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post