[113931] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IXP
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Arnold Nipper)
Fri Apr 24 02:17:06 2009
Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 08:16:09 +0200
From: Arnold Nipper <arnold@nipper.de>
To: Paul Vixie <vixie@isc.org>
In-Reply-To: <g3r5zihleb.fsf@nsa.vix.com>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156)
--------------enigE7F759AEAF6313CBBC514874
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On 24.04.2009 03:48 Paul Vixie wrote
> "Bill Woodcock" <woody@pch.net> writes:
>=20
>> ... Nobody's arguing against VLANs. Paul's argument was that VLANs
>> rendered shared subnets obsolete, and everybody else has been rebuttin=
g
>> that. Not saying that VLANs shouldn't be used.
>=20
> i think i saw several folks, not just stephen, say virtual wire was how=
> they'd do an IXP today if they had to start from scratch. i know that
> for many here, starting from scratch isn't a reachable worldview, and s=
o
> i've tagged most of the defenses of shared subnets with that caveat. t=
he
> question i was answering was from someone starting from scratch, and wh=
en
> starting an IXP from scratch, a shared subnet would be just crazy talk.=
I like to disagree here, Paul.
Best regards,
Arnold
--=20
Arnold Nipper / nIPper consulting, Sandhausen, Germany
email: arnold@nipper.de phone: +49 6224 9259 299
mobile: +49 172 2650958 fax: +49 6224 9259 333
--------------enigE7F759AEAF6313CBBC514874
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFJ8Vkprz6CwpRB/EwRAtqlAJwIiPwSOaETn7Gh6O32TBHPHAEClACeMZm8
MzULD4HnwvAU8rH3bzsrars=
=lpDf
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--------------enigE7F759AEAF6313CBBC514874--
